Mayak Nuclear Industrial Complex (South Urals) 
Scenario 

     In May 1946, work on the construction of a nuclear-industrial complex in the province of Cheryabinsk (southern Urals), known as the Mayak Production Association (MPA), was started for the production of weapons-grade plutonium. The MPA comprised of a radiochemical separation plant (Facility B), isotpe plants and uranium-graphite reactors (Facility A), and started production in 1948.

    The use of new and hazardous technologies and inadequate construction materials resulted in extremely high radiation exposures of the workers especially during the early years of operation.

    At Facility A, the main source of external exposure was gamma-radiation. During the years 1949 to 1953, about 1600 workers received an average annual dose of 326 mSv. The average total dose was 1220 mSv. At Facility B (about 2500 workers), the average annual dose was 700 mSv and the average total dose was 2450 mSv. In this group, the workers were exposed to external gamma-irradiation and 239Pu aerosols.

    Due to the release of about 76×106m3 of liquid waste radioactive fission products with a total of 1017 Bq from Mayak facility into the Techa River (between 1949 and 1956), a large number of resident of the riverside area have been exposed externally to 137Cs and internally predominantly to 90Sr (cited from Salassidis et al., Int. J. Radiat. Biol., 74:431-439, 1998).

   Several studies have been performed to examine chromosome aberration frequencies in peripheral blood lymphocytes of the industrial workers and the residents in the vicinity of Techa River to see the reliability of the documented dose mostly by the use of translocation assay by FISH chromosome painting technology as listed below. As in the case of Chernobyl cleanup workers, they are unanimously raised a problem of discrepancy between chromosome-based dose and physically evaluated documented dose, such as no clear dose-response relationship and/or severely suppressed chromosome aberration level as compared to physically documented doses. 

[1] Mayak industrial workers (Salassidis et al. 1998) 

Chromosome aberration analysis 

     The frequencies of symmetrical translocations in blood lymphocytes were examined by FISH painting (1, 4, 12 whole chromosome probes) in 75 Mayak workers who hade received their main radiation exposures between 1948 and 1963. A group of 33 healthy unexposed persons from non-contaminated areas of the Southern Urals, aged 45-74 years (mean 59±8) was used as control. In the pooled data set, translocation frequencies showed a significant dependence on cumulative external gamma-ray doses, but with suppressed rate as compared with the frequencies in the in vitro experiment. The uptake of 239Pu had no substantial influence.  

Reference 

    Salasaidis, K., Braselmann, H., Okladnikova, N. D., Pressl, S., Stephan, G., Snigiryova, G. and Bauchinger, M. (1998): Analysis of symmetrical translocations for retrospective biodosimetry in radiation workers of the Mayak nuclear-industrial complex (Southern Ural) using FISH-chromosome painting. Int. J. Radiat. Biol., 74:431-439. 
.
Subject Age Sex Exposed dose No. of FG Subject Age Sex Exposed dose No. of FG
ID (year) (M;F) External (Gy) Internal:Pu (kBq) cells tr/100 cells ID (year) (M;F) External (Gy) Internal:Pu (kBq) cells tr/100 cells
1 65 M 0.02 1.99 436 1.5 25 71 F 3.09 0.56 680 1.4
2 65 M 0.02 1.48 610 0.0 26 65 F 3.10 9.84 1,032 0.3
3 63 M 0.12 1.85 418 2.3 27 65 F 3.31 0.37 1,015 4.4
4 53 M 0.24 2.07 380 3.3 28 70 F 3.35 0.33 933 0.7
5 65 M 0.32 0.52 456 1.4 29 66 M 3.76 10.50 568 4.5
6 64 M 0.79 0.41 497 0.6 30 68 F 3.80 0.63 541 3.3
7 67 F 0.91 0.41 688 1.8 31 67 M 3.91 2.80 565 3.9
8 68 M 1.03 4.40 771 2.1 32 68 M 4.05 0.81 523 4.8
9 63 F 1.13 0.51 861 0.4 33 63 F 4.07 0.41 502 1.9
10 71 F 1.13 6.96 990 0.6 34 67 M 4.11 11.47 690 2.3
11 69 F 1.18 0.55 427 0.7 35 67 M 4.20 0.77 452 3.5
12 63 F 1.38 0.92 530 3.0 36 63 F 4.27 0.85 792 6.0
13 60 M 1.67 1.44 716 0.9 37 62 F 4.75 0.55 450 2.1
14 65 F 1.73 0.33 586 1.6 38 68 F 4.75 1.07 985 2.6
15 68 F 1.79 0.44 735 2.2 39 66 M 4.98 0.55 470 1.3
16 68 M 1.98 0.51 521 1.8 40 68 F 4.99 0.44 392 0.0
17 71 F 2.04 0.26 438 0.0 41 66 M 5.01 2.18 665 1.4
18 78 M 2.36 0.70 503 1.9 42 66 M 5.77 0.70 481 0.0
19 68 M 2.47 1.15 796 1.2 43 65 F 5.96 0.74 525 1.2
20 68 M 2.70 0.74 481 4.6 44 68 F 6.29 0.33 562 1.1
21 70 F 2.75 0.52 508 2.5 45 67 F 6.38 0.55 522 3.6
22 70 M 2.90 0.88 139 4.6 46 70 M 9.47 1.48 434 5.8
23 69 M 2.98 2.62 500 0.0 47 67 M 9.75 14.80 657 2.9
24 66 F 3.03 1.22 213 3.0 48 66 M 9.91 14.80 280 3.4
.

Comentary:
     The right panel is a reassessment by auto-regressive moving window averaging (ARMWA) added for additional information during the data compilation. They are solely on our responsibility and do not necessary reflect the conclusion of the authors.

 
 


[2] Mayak industrial workers (Burak et al. 2001)  
Chromosome aberration analysis 

     The frequencies of symmetrical translocations in blood lymphocytes were examined by FISH painting (1,2,4 chromosome probes) in 27 workers at the MPA facilities. Blood samples were taken in 1996. Also blood samples were taken from two individuals residing in Ozyorsk, who dis not work in radiation-related jobs. Translocation (FG-Tr) increased with doses, but with the rate substantially lower than that in the in vitro irradiation. 

Reference 
     Burak, L. E., Kodama, Y., Nakano, M., Ohtaki, K., Itoh, M., Oklandnikova, N. D., Vasilenko, E. K., Cologne, J. B. and Nakamura, N. (2001): FISH examination of lymphocytes from Mayak workers for assessment of transloction induction rate unde chronic radiation exposures. Int. J. Radiat. Biol., 77:901-908. 
.
Subject Age Sex Dose No. of Aberrations*
ID (years) (M,F) Gamma (Gy) Pu (kBq) cells t ins cx dic FG(%)
1 66 M 4.2 1.147 500 10 0 2 1 6.7
2 69 M 1.32 0.74 500 4 0 0 0 2.2
3 66 M 1.24 1.295 500 10 0 0 0 5.5
4 66 F 4.85 4.699 500 10 0 0 1 5.6
5 80 F 1.14 1.406 499 9 0 0 0 5.1
6 69 M 3.64 1.554 500 10 0 0 0 5.5
7 66 F 3.14 1.184 499 8 0 0 0 4.5
8 65 F 6.91 0 494 10** 0 0 2 5.7
9 73 M 0.72 0 500 4 0 0 0 2.2
10 71 M 1.22 0.444 500 7 0 0 1 3.9
11 66 M 7.91 1.702 500 7 0 1 1 4.4
12 67 M 7.46 2.442 500 19 1 0 0 11.1
13 79 M 8.5 0.333 500 22 0 0 0 12.2
14 72 F 3.57 0.259 500 13 0 0 0 7.3
15 69 F 1.61 0.666 500 3 0 0 0 1.7
16 69 F 2.09 16.65 500 18 0 0 1 10.1
17 68 F 0.13 0.666 500 1 0 2 1 1.2
18 68 F 5.38 1.813 500 11 1 0 0 6.7
19 70 F 1.17 0 500 6 0 0 0 3.4
20 56 F 0 0 500 3 0 0 0 1.7
21 61 M 0 0 499 4 0 0 0 2.2
22 69 M 0 0 500 6 0 0 0 3.3
23 68 F 2.71 0.777 500 7 0 0 0 3.9
24 57 M 0 0.259 500 3 1 0 0 2.2
25 64 F 0 0 500 5 0 0 0 2.8
26 57 M 0 0 500 5 0 0 0 2.8
27 72 F 1.34 2.072 499 12 0 3 1 8.4
28 55 M 0 0 500 2 0 0 0 1.1
29 72 F 3.69 0.148 499 9 1 0 0 5.6
*) t: translocation. Ins: insertion. Cx: complex. Dic: dicentric. FG: genome equivalent stable translocation.
**) Seven translocations were identical (clonal) and therefore counted as one translocation.
.

Comentary:
     The right panel is a reassessment by auto-regressive moving window averaging (ARMWA) added for additional information during the data compilation. They are solely on our responsibility and do not necessary reflect the conclusion of the authors.
 
 


[3] Mayak industrial workers (Bauchinger et al. 2001)  
Chromosome aberration analysis  

     This is a collaborative exercise of four laboratories for the use of FISH technology in the retrospective biodosimetry. Chromosome analysis was carried out in blood lymphocytes from 69 Mayak nuclear industrial workers. Blood samples were taken in 1997-1999 in FIB1 (Public Health Ministry of the Russian Federation, Chelyabinsk), chromosome preparations were made in MIRID (Moscow Research Institute of Diagnostic and Surgery, Moscow), coded samples with fixed cells were sent to GSF (National Research Center for Environment and Health, Neuherberg), and they were distributed to four participating laboratories (UK, Netherlands, Germany and Russian Federation) to perform collaborative exercise.

     The stable chromosome translocations were examine by FISH painting method (1,4,8 chromosome probes). The chromosomally estimated doses were mainly lower than those predicted from in vitro calibration curve.  

Reference  

     Bauchinger, M., Braselmann, H., Savage, J. R. K., Natarajan, A. T., Terzoudi, G., Pantelias, G. E., Darroudi, F., Figgitt, M., Griffin, C. S., Knekr, S., Oklandnikova, N. D., Santos, S. and Snigiryova, G. (2001): Collabortive exercise on the use of FISH chromosome painting for retrospective biodosimetry od Mayak nuclear-industrial personnel. Int. J. Radiat. Biol., 77:259-267.

Cf.
     Edwards, A. A. (2001): Letter to the Editor: A critique of ‘Collaborative exercise on the use of FISH chromosome paining for retrospective biodosimetry of Mayak nuclear-industry personnel. Int. J. Radiat. Biol., 78:867-871.
Bauchinger, M. (2001): Reply to letter from Edwards: A critique of ‘Collborative exercise on the use of FISH chromosome painting for retrospective biodosimetry of Mayak nuclear-industrial personnel’. Int. J. Radiat. Biol., 78:871-873.  

 
.
Subject Age Sex Dose* No. of No. of Subject Age Sex Dose* No. of No. of
ID (year) (M;F) D-air (Gy) I-total (Sv) BM dose (Sv) cells 2B** ID (year) (M;F) D-air (Gy) I-total (Sv) BM dose (Sv) cells 2B
S7762 58 M 1.014 0.113 0.834 1,112 5 G7806 44 M 0.310 0.078 0.287 1,983 4
S7787 68 F 0.850 0.129 0.724 1,231 9 G7810 60 M 0.514 0.111 0.463 2,000 1
S7808 59 F 0.370 0.090 0.340 2,643 14 G7841 57 M 0.335 0.083 0.309 2,000 1
S7820 65 M 1.393 0.127 1.125 1,112 10 G7842 71 M 2.150 0.139 1.694 1,000 7
S7824 58 M 0.435 0.105 0.400 2,127 14 G7858 58 M 0.525 0.084 0.451 1,192 8
S7843 65 M 2.766 0.128 2.142 1,085 11 G7863 70 M 2.148 0.139 1.692 616 6
S7857 65 M 0.710 0.134 0.625 521 2 G7876 62 F 0.970 0.123 0.809 1,000 0
S7859 72 F 1.289 0.150 1.065 1,059 3 G7880 68 F 2.728 0.144 2.125 721 6
S7862 60 M 0.409 0.099 0.376 877 5 G7899 64 M 1.170 0.137 0.967 1,032 10
S7875 65 M 1.209 0.136 0.995 2,046 7 G7900 61 F 0.341 0.122 0.343 3,018 15
S7879 61 M 1.190 0.120 0.969 985 3 G7984 58 M 0.516 0.089 0.448 2,141 30
S7883 57 M 0.926 0.092 0.753 1,142 11 G7991 47 M 10.198 0.066 0.195 1,000 6
S7896 64 M 1.837 0.129 1.455 2,099 13 G7992 63 M 0.078 0.068 0.108 1,000 1
S7898 46 M 0.297 0.062 0.266 2,133 6 C7766 39 M 0.026 0.047 0.054 1,082 0
S7926 58 M 0.757 0.090 0.627 2,287 4 C7785 63 M 0.107 0.037 0.107 1,116 8
S7931 67 F 0.035 0.080 0.110 1,173 3 C7789 55 M 0.204 0.094 0.221 990 7
S7932 71 M 0.031 0.076 0.105 2,469 6 C7805 62 F 0.478 0.110 0.435 1,448 51
S7982 64 M 0.525 0.120 0.477 2,041 4 C7809 59 M 0.870 0.102 0.719 1,324 18
R7784 69 M 2.347 0.145 1.844 1,004 17 C7822 68 F 0.836 0.130 0.715 1,710 30
R7788 65 F 0.317 0.113 0.318 1,131 7 C7839 65 M 1.695 0.133 1.353 1,016 28
R7804 59 M 0.074 0.072 0.108 1,316 12 C7840 56 M 0.437 0.092 0.391 1,200 12
R7808 59 F 0.370 0.090 0.340 661 5 C7860 54 M 0.785 0.082 0.642 945 38
R7837 58 M 0.595 0.104 0.517 2,045 14 C7864 73 F 2.397 0.145 1.881 980 38
R7838 58 M 1.450 0.122 1.163 1,069 10 C7866 66 M 0.592 0.120 0.527 1,104 18
R7861 54 F 0.317 0.079 0.293 2,038 9 C7877 70 F 1.833 0.132 4.454 1,020 93
R7874 62 M 1.639 0.113 1.296 1,006 11 C7881 66 F 1.668 0.142 1.339 1,100 13
R7882 66 M 2.778 0.126 2.149 1,003 23 C7897 67 M 0.911 0.136 0.775 1,003 27
R7895 66 M 0.869 0.121 0.733 2,050 11 C7902 62 M 0.271 0.121 0.290 1,000 15
R7901 71 M 6.065 0.144 4.595 1,006 25 C7904 60 M 0.257 0.088 0.255 1,005 6
R7903 70 M 0.390 0.104 0.366 1,299 13 C7988 45 M 0.091 0.060 0.112 1,012 5
R7925 61 M 1.307 0.132 1.065 1,137 11 C7985 45 M 0.040 0.067 0.079 1,000 4
R7983 46 M 0.297 0.062 0.266 1,100 2 C8066 62 M 0.287 0.104 0.289 1,018 12
R7994 59 M 0.194 0.064 0.191 1,021 2 C8067 46 M 0.060 0.053 0.053 900 2
G7761 48 M 0.232 0.057 0.214 2,010 2 C8091 61 M 0.603 0.117 0.533 714 8
G7786 63 M 1.609 0.119 1.279 1,090 12 .
*) D-air: occupational dose (gamma). I-total: background dose. BM-dose: bone marrow dose. BM-dose)=[(D-air)+(8I-total)]×0.74 depending on ICRP 1974.
**) 2B: reciprocal translocation. .
.
 
Comentary:
     The above is a reassessment by auto-regressive moving window averaging (ARMWA) added for additional information during the data compilation. They are solely on our responsibility and do not necessary reflect the conclusion of the authors.


[4] Mayak industrial workers (Oklandnikova et al. 2005) 
Chromosome aberration analysis  

     Lymphocyte chromosome analysis was carried out on 79 plutonium workers with 239Pu body burden ranging from 0 to 15.5 kBq. Stable, unstable and total aberrations increased as the 239Pu body burden increased over the range 0-4.5 kBq. However, above this rnge little additional increase was observed. Unstable, but not stable, aberrations were correlated with external gamma radiation dose. 

Reference 

     Okladnikova, N. D., Scott, B. R., Tokarskaya, Z. B., Zhuntova, G. V., Khokhoryakov, V. F., Syrchikov, V. A. and Grigoryeva, E. S. (2005): Chromosomal aberrations in lymphocytes of peripheral blood among Mayak facility workers who inhaled insoluble from of 239Pu. Radiat. Prot. Dosimet., 113:3-13. 

Chromosome aberration frequencies against 239Pu body burden (adopted from Oklandnikova et al. 2005)  



[5] Mayak industrial workers (Sotnik et al. 2014) 
Chromosome aberration analysis 

     Chromosome translocations in lymphocytes were analyzed by multi-color fluorescence in situ hybridization (mFISH) method for 60 Mayak PA workers (42 males and 18 females). Their mean exposure conditions were 1.41±1.12 Gy for external gamma-rays with its red bone marrow (RBM) absorbed dose of 0.87±0.76 Gy, and 2.54±4.27 kBq for 239Pu body burden with its internal absorbed dose by alpha particles to the red bone marrow of 0.10±0.18 Gy. Their duration of employment at Mayak PA was 30.0±13.7 years. Majority (84%) of workers were exposed to mixed external gamma-rays and internal plutonium. The control group consisted of 15 Ozyorsk residents (8 males and 7 females; mean age of 62.4±12.5 years). They have not worked with ionizing radiation sources, not involved in cleanup activity and not lived in the contaminated regions. 

Reference  

     Sotnik, N. V., Osovets, S. V., Scherthan, H. and Azizova, T. V. (2014): mFISH analysis of chromosome aberrations in workers occupationally exposed to mixed radiation. Radiat. Environ. Biophys., 53:347-354. 

Dose-response profiles  

     A: Translocation frequencies against absorbed RBM dose from external gamma-rays. B: Complex aberration frequencies against 239Pu body burden.
     Aa and Ba are scatter plots presented by the authors. Ab and Bb are the frequencies shown after data smoothing by moving windows averaging, MWA=(w5,s1), calculated at data compling for reference.
 



[6] Mayak industrial workers (Sotnik et al. 2015)   
Chromosome aberration analysis  

    The reliability, usefulness and validation of translocation assay for retrospective biodosimetry by FISH painting technology have been tested in Mayak nuclear industrial workers. Blood samples were collected from 94 workers between 2005 and 2008, and translocation frequencies were examined by FISH chromosome painting in three laboratories (Southern Urals Biophysics Institute, Chelyabinsk; Public Health England, Oxford, and Leiden University, Leiden).

     The chromosomally estimated dose (DFISH) based on in vitro calibration for gamma-rays was reasonably consistent with that in red marrow dose (Dfilm) calculated from the film badge reading (external gamma-rays).
That is, DFISH=(0.29±0.09)+(0.38±0.07)Dfilm., where dose, D, in Gy. Despite two doses are linearly correlated, the chromosomal dose, DFISH, is 62% lower than physical dose, and further the systematic deviation was 0.29 Gy.
 

Reference  

     Sotnik, N. V., Azizova, T. V., Darroudi, F., Ainsbury, E. A., Moquet, J. E., Fomina, J., Lloyd, D. C., Hone, P. A. and Edwards, A. A. (2015): Verification by the FISH translocation ssay of historic doses of Mayak workers from external gamma radiation. Radiat. Environ. Biophys., 54:445-451. 

.
Male Female Both
No. of workers 66 28 94
Age atbkood sampling 72.2±5.6 77.2±4.2 73.7±5.7
External gamma (film badge), Gy 1.55±0.90 1.78±0.83 1.61±0.89
239Pu body burden, kBq 0.42±0.70 0.38±0.26 0.41±0.60
Total red marrow dose from 239Pu, Gy 0.02±0.04 0.02±0.01 0.02±0.03
Duration of employment at Mayak PA, years 37.2±11.4 29.0±10.7 34.7±11.7
.
 
 
Ralationship between BM dose corresponding to film-bage reading and FISF based dose


[7] Mayak industrial workers (Hande et al. 2003; Mitchell et al. 2004; Hande et al. 2005); mFISH/mBAND   
Chromosome aberration analysis  

     The mFISH/mBAND technology was applied to the Mayak industrial workers. Usually FISH-painting is applied to paint 1, 2 or 3 pairs of whole chromosomes together with centromere staining. Thus, the FISH painting visualizes symmetric (translocation) and asymmetric (dicentric) interchromosomal interchanges as a color switch. The scored aberrations can often be converted to the genome-equivalent frequencies, FG, considering the relative physical size of the painted chromosomes. The mFISH enable to distinguish all 23 pairs of chromosomes, and mBAND is the method to see longitudinal differentiation of a chromosome. mFISH may give the genome wide interchromosomal interchanges directly, and mBAND gives the frequencies of intrachromosomal interchanges, i.e., number of two-break events per base pairs of DNA. The intrachromosomal interchanges, mBAND aberrations, are more readily induced by high LET radiations, such as alpha-particles. Indeed, the mBAND aberrations were confirmed to increase in response to plutonium (alpha-emitter) body burden in the Mayak industrial workers. Similarly, complex translocations increase in proportion to plutonium dose to bone marrow of the Mayak workers. 

Reference   

     Hande, M. P., Azizova, T. V., Geard, C. R., Burak, L. E., Mitchell, C. R., Khokhryakov, V. F., Vasilenko, E. K. and Brenner, D. J. (2003): Past exposure to densely ionizing radiation leaves a unique permanent signature in the genome. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 72:1162-1170.
     Mitchell, C. R., Azizova, T. V., Hande, M. P., Burak, L. E., Tsakok, J. M., Khokryakov, V. F., Geard, C. R. and Brenner, D. J. (2004): Stable intrachromosomal biomarkers of past exposure to desely ionizing radiation in several chromosomes of exposed individuals. Radiat. Res., 162:257-263.
     Hande, M. P., Azizova, T. V., Burak, L. E., Khokhryakov, V. F., Geard, C. R. and Brenner, D. J. (2005): Complex chromosome aberrations persist in individuals many years after occupational exposure to densely ionizing radiation: An mFISH study. Genes Chrom. Cancer, 44:1-9. 

.
Aberrations observed in chromosome 1 by mBAND Aberrations observed in chromosome 2 by mBAND
Group of subjects Intrachromosomal aberrations Other aberrations Intrachromosomal aberrations Other aberrations
by BM dose No. of No. of paracentric Pericentric Complex Interstitial Terminal No. of No. of paracentric Pericentric Complex Interstitial Terminal
individuals cells inversion inversion inversion deletion deletion Insertion Translocation individuals cells inversion inversion inversion deletion deletion Insertion Translocation
High Pu 8 1,012 2 1 2 13 6 0 9 9 1,203 1 2 1 13 6 0 10
Pu0.4Gy 8 1,093 3 1 1 11 2 2 6 9 1,229 0 3 1 7 2 0 8
High γ 10 1,281 0 2 0 0 1 0 11 10 1,404 0 0 0 0 4 0 10
γ1.5Gy 10 1,328 0 1 0 0 0 0 6 10 1,413 1 3 0 1 3 1 8
Moderate Pu and γ 4 497 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 412 0 0 0 0 1 0 3
Pu<0.4Gy; γ<0.4Gy 4 500 0 0 0 1 0 0 6 3 436 0 0 0 2 1 0 2
Controls 4 561 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 681 0 0 0 2 0 0 4
4 574 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 5 696 0 0 0 1 0 0 4
.
.
Subject Bone marrow mFISH mBAND (chromosome 5)
plutonium dose No. of Complex No. of No. of
(Gy) cells Translocations cells intrachromosomal aberrations
High plutonium 1 2.08 136 4 135 9
2 2.00 126 2 125 5
3 1.27 108 4 115 5
4 1.21 131 5 135 5
5 1.13 144 9 141 7
6 1.02 106 3 110 6
7 0.94 135 5 147 2
8 0.89 129 3 145 2
9 0.77 120 2 126 5
10 0.64 153 3 157 5
11 0.44 126 1 152 4
Moderate plutonium 12 0.33 110 0 111 0
13 0.17 113 0 127 2
14 0.14 110 0 110 2
15 0.11 111 1 110 0
.